互联网法院 区块链存证,司法区块链管理规范

区块链存证是一种新型的数据存证技术，它可以将数据永久地存储在区块链上。它可以帮助企业更有效地管理数据，并可以提供可信的数据存证服务，以实现数据的可信存储和有效管理。

互联网法院是一种新型的司法机构，它采用互联网技术提供司法服务，可以更快更准确地处理案件。它可以通过高效的网络技术，提供更加便捷的司法服务，更好地解决人们的司法问题。

司法区块链管理规范是一种基于区块链技术的司法管理规范，它旨在提高司法机构的效率，提高司法机构的可信度，改善司法机构的服务质量。它可以通过构建司法区块链系统，实现司法数据的可信存储，提高司法机构的效率，改善司法机构的服务质量。

数据存证技术是一种新型的数据存证技术，它可以将数据永久地存储在区块链上，并可以提供可信的数据存证服务，以实现数据的可信存储和有效管理。数据存证技术可以帮助企业更有效地管理数据，并且可以有效地防止数据泄露和篡改。此外，数据存证技术还可以提供可信的存证服务，以便企业能够更安全地存储数据，并有效地管理数据。

互联网法院是一种新型的司法机构，它采用互联网技术提供司法服务，可以更快更准确地处理案件。互联网法院可以通过高效的网络技术，提供更加便捷的司法服务，更好地解决人们的司法问题。此外，互联网法院还可以采用区块链技术提供司法服务，以更好地保护当事人的权益，并有效地实现司法数据的可信存储。

司法区块链管理规范是一种基于区块链技术的司法管理规范，它旨在提高司法机构的效率，提高司法机构的可信度，改善司法机构的服务质量。司法区块链管理规范可以通过构建司法区块链系统，实现司法数据的可信存储，提高司法机构的效率，改善司法机构的服务质量。此外，司法区块链管理规范还可以通过实施司法区块链技术，更好地保护当事人的权益，并有效地实现司法数据的可信存储。

⑴ How does the micro-copyright, the intellectual property protection platform under Yibaoquan, do a good job in blockchain certification?

Each institution has different ways of safeguarding rights. Many of them are within the scope of intellectual property protection

⑵ Multiple types of data are shared on the "chain", online and offline services are coordinated, and blockchain government affairs make things easier

"Blockchain What kind of sparks will come out of "+Government Affairs"? Mawei Xingang Community in Fuzhou City, Fujian Province uses blockchain technology to solve the pain points of government informatization and launches a "blockchain + community certification" application. "This application can easily realize the electronic issuance of certificates required by enterprises and the masses, promote the transformation from 'reduced certificates' to 'no certificates', let data run instead of people running errands, improve service efficiency, and better serve the people. "Ms. Zhu, a citizen of Fuzhou, said.

Provident funds can be transferred and continued in other places

"Post-90s" Chen Jing joined a new company at the end of last year, and her work location changed from Hangzhou, Zhejiang to Chengdu, Sichuan. If you change your workplace, how can you transfer the previously accumulated housing provident fund to a new account? After consultation, Chen Jing learned that by searching for the "National Housing Provident Fund" applet on her mobile phone, she could realize the transfer to other places. According to the relevant person in charge of the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development, the "National Housing Provident Fund" applet will be launched online in October 2021. The Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development has built a credible data environment for the operation of the applet by deepening the application of new technologies such as blockchain to ensure that depositors information and financial security. Thanks to blockchain technology, depositors can transfer housing provident fund accounts and funds across cities through mini programs. They no longer need to go to the counter to handle off-site transfers and continuations, which greatly shortens the processing time and further facilitates the cross-regional flow of human resources. .

Multiple types of data are shared on the "chain", online and offline services are coordinated, and the use of blockchain technology improves the efficiency of government departments and public satisfaction. For example, Haidian District in Beijing has opened a "Blockchain Zone" on the Haidiantong APP, which can directly handle public rental housing subsidies, Haidian District high-tech talent training subsidy approval, etc... With the application of new technologies such as blockchain, many government affairs The service realizes "one-stop service and full online service".

In addition, Zhuzhou City in Hunan Province has also innovated administrative approval service methods and launched blockchain application scenarios for electronic certificates, effectively improving the level of government data sharing and business collaboration efficiency; Fuzhou City has launched the "Rongcheng on the Chain" plan , exploring the use of blockchain technology in four fields including e-government, financial technology, social governance, and people's livelihood security.

Why does the government field favor blockchain technology? Industry insiders believe that blockchain technology has the characteristics of non-tampering, security, confidentiality and traceability, and is highly suitable for government service needs such as cross-domain data sharing and business collaborative management. Active use of blockchain technology can solve the problem of data sharing in the government service process. to solve problems such as difficulties in business coordination and improve government management services, overall planning and coordination capabilities.

Effectively supporting people’s livelihood services

Related management service platforms based on blockchain in many places in China have been launched frequently: in Jiangsu, the country’s first transfer of idle residential use rights based on blockchain technology The transaction was successfully completed. Relying on the provincial information service platform, the transaction information can be directly uploaded to the "chain" for certificate storage, ensuring that the housing source is credible and the results are traceable; in Zhejiang, the first intellectual property blockchain public certificate storage platform was officially launched, providing data Assets, original designs and other intellectual property rights provide efficient and fast certificate storage services; in Yunnan, the Provincial Market Supervision Administration and the Provincial Key Laboratory of Blockchain Application Technology jointly carry out Yunnan Province’s blockchain underlying chain food traceability work based on domestically produced independent , through blockchain technology, we can promote product source traceability, one-stop code, logistics tracking, responsibility identification and credit evaluation, so that blockchain technology can truly contribute to people's livelihood services.

Hu Kai, a professor at the School of Computer Science at Beihang University, told this reporter that the current blockchain industry applications are mainly divided into four categories: real economy, financial services, social governance and people's livelihood services. The government attaches great importance to guiding blockchain The application of chain in manufacturing, energy, government affairs, education and other fields has been implemented.

Active drive at the policy level has allowed blockchain to continue to advance in industries such as judicial evidence storage and transportation and shipping data sharing. In May, the Supreme People's Court issued the "Opinions of the Supreme People's Court on Strengthening the Judicial Application of Blockchain", proposing that by 2025, a blockchain alliance for interoperability and sharing between people's courts and all walks of life should be established to form a relatively complete blockchain judicial system. Field application standard system. In June, the Ministry of Transport issued the "Guidelines for the Construction of an Electronic Platform for Imported Dry Bulk Cargo Entry and Port Business Based on Blockchain" in June, proposing to promote the in-depth integration and development of blockchain technology and the transportation industry.

Let data flow safely and orderly

Hu Kai believes that today, with the rapid development of the digital economy, numbers and data are key elements for future social development, but there are still legal issues behind the data. , interoperability, privacy, security, traceability, storage, transactions and many other complex issues. How to make data flow more securely and orderly? Blockchain technology has broad room for development.

Blockchain technology is accelerating breakthrough applications and playing a role in establishing a trustworthy and secure digital economic order and promoting high-quality economic and social development. The China Academy of Information and Communications Technology released the "Blockchain Infrastructure Research Report (2022)" in July this year, proposing that as the scale of blockchain infrastructure construction continues to expand and operating capabilities continue to increase, blockchain can not only be used in encrypted digital Currency and other scenarios can also be developed in manufacturing, service industries and other fields.Application practice has been developed, and typical application scenarios such as digital collections, data circulation, supply chain finance, and product traceability have emerged.

⑶ How can blockchain better ensure the effectiveness of electronic contracts

Electronic contracts themselves are a kind of electronic data, which have security flaws such as easy tampering and deletion, which is not conducive to the service. Long-term development. In order to ensure the legal validity of electronic documents and electronic contracts signed by users on the electronic contract platform, the entire process of electronic contract signing needs to be documented.

In the "Legal Chain" application implemented based on blockchain certification technology, the platform will archive the key links of electronic contract signing and distribute key information and data. Store it in the entire blockchain, thereby realizing the entire process of electronic contract storage.

Taking a closer look at its implementation principles, blockchain uses machine algorithms to solve the problem of consistency, reliable storage and prevention of multi-party transaction records through in-depth use of cryptographic algorithms, specially designed data structures and multi-party consensus algorithms. The problem of tampering is naturally closely related to electronic data storage.

First of all, electronic contract signing records are stored on a shared ledger maintained by multiple parties, which cannot be tampered with, cannot be repudiated, and of course will not be lost.

Secondly, the electronic contract text and electronic contract elements are encrypted and stored, including the participants of the electronic contract. Only participants can decrypt and view the data to protect the privacy of the contracting parties.

Thirdly, the machine strictly executes according to the predefined rules (smart contract) and no longer relies solely on an agreement with a third party to guarantee it. The blockchain-based KYC service automatically checks and verifies the validity and identity of the certificate, ensuring that the identity of the participants is valid and authentic while ensuring privacy.

Currently, all electronic contracts signed on our electronic contract platform use blockchain technology to realize the distributed storage of digital fingerprints of electronic documents, further strengthening the legal validity of the electronic contracts on the platform.

⑷ The Beijing Internet Court and the blockchain evidence storage system "IP360" have achieved seamless connection

Recently, the IP360 platform evidence has been connected with the Beijing Internet Court litigation platform, and the evidence submitted Evidence can be provided through the IP360 platform and submitted to the Beijing Internet Court Platform.

On the afternoon of September 25, the Dongcheng District Court of Beijing made a judgment on the case of JD.com infringing the rights of information network dissemination of the works of the Chinese Online Digital Publishing Group. In this judgment, the court adopted the IP360 forensic data evidence provided by Zhenchen Technology, confirmed the legal validity of the electronic data stored using blockchain technology, and clarified the review and judgment method for electronic evidence stored in the blockchain.

This is the first time that the Beijing Dongcheng District Court has made a judgment on an intellectual property case based on blockchain evidence, which has aroused widespread attention from the public and also laid a good foundation for the completion of the docking with the Beijing Internet Court. Base.

But nationwideThis is not the only case in which “blockchain + certificate storage” has been recognized by the court.

Subsequently, on September 7, the Supreme People's Court issued regulations on several issues in the trial of Internet courts. The regulations clearly state that “the electronic data submitted by the parties shall be authenticated through electronic signatures, trusted timestamps, hash value verification, blockchain and other evidence collection, fixation and anti-tampering technical means, or through electronic evidence collection and storage platforms. If it can prove its authenticity, the Internet court should confirm it.”

With the establishment of Internet courts in Hangzhou, Beijing, Guangzhou and other places, the blockchain evidence storage system is undoubtedly an important part of the construction process of Internet courts. The biggest highlight. In the case where traditional electronic data itself is easily tampered with, blockchain, as a "distributed storage technology", has the characteristics of irreversibility and non-tampering. Through blockchain smart contracts, business rules are abstracted into digital contracts and embedded in blockchain for execution. , and can be verified, ensuring that every step is carried out strictly in accordance with the pre-set process, thus ensuring the authenticity of electronic data. In the case where Chinese Online won a lawsuit against JD.com for the right to disseminate information on its work information network, it was through online evidence collection through the blockchain evidence storage system "IP360". It is understood that the system is based on the certificate storage and confirmation platform independently developed by legalXchain, a judicial alliance chain owned by Zhenchen Technology. Working with the Ministry of Public Security, judicial appraisal, notary offices and other institutions, the review and identification of electronic evidence can be completed online, greatly improving litigation efficiency.

Compared with traditional litigation methods, "blockchain evidence storage" is undoubtedly a huge progress. With the continuous upgrading of blockchain technology, future litigation resolution will only be more fair and efficient.

⑸ What does Yi Baoquan’s “blockchain + judicial + application” model look like

Yi Baoquan’s “blockchain + judicial + application” model is based on Blockchain certificate storage integrates notary offices, judicial appraisal centers, arbitration committees, Internet courts, copyright protection centers, CA institutions, etc. into the blockchain nodes of the preservation chain open platform, allowing electronic data to be processed from generation to certificate storage to the final The use has judicial endorsement by relevant judicial agencies, effectively ensuring the security and judicial validity of blockchain evidence data.

There are currently three models: 1. "Blockchain + Judiciary + Electronic Signing" Junzi Sign in the field of electronic signing helps users transfer traditional offline paper contracts to online signing, through real-name Authentication, identity authentication, signing intention authentication, timestamp, satellite timing, online signing, data storage, blockchain anti-tampering, signature management, account management, contract management, data synchronization with judicial institutions, online notarization, one-click Certificate issuance, intelligent arbitration, risk agency, litigation insurance.

2. "Blockchain + Judiciary + Intellectual Property" provides one-stop intellectual property protection services such as online confirmation of works rights, infringement monitoring, infringement analysis, network evidence collection, and agency rights protection. Help photographers, designers, lawyers, writers and other users solve online publishing problemsDigital copyright certificates, online notarial certificates and judicial acceptance issues.

3. "Blockchain + Internet Judicial Service" Zhongzhengbao in the Internet judicial field mainly provides services such as online arbitration filing applications, agency execution, and direct evidence access to the arbitration committee for corporate and individual users. The notary office provides one-stop Internet notarization system construction, notarization intelligent terminals and corresponding customized services, including network-enabled notarization system, data storage notarization system, and self-service notarization system. Realize paperless one-stop service for business cooperation integrating products and judicial justice.

⑹ How is blockchain applied in the legal field?

Using blockchain technology to deposit and issue electronic evidence is the application of blockchain technology in the legal field. Foundation.

Blockchain technology can be used to securely protect electronic data, prevent tampering, and perform data processing throughout the entire life cycle of electronic data generation, collection, transmission, and storage. Traces of operation.

Use blockchain technology to preserve electronic evidence, record the electronic data that needs to be deposited in the form of transactions, stamp it with a timestamp, and record it in the block, thereby completing data preservation and evidence storage. process. During the data storage process, multiple participating nodes jointly witness and jointly maintain a distributed ledger, thus greatly reducing the possibility of data loss, tampering, and attack.

The combination of blockchain and electronic data storage can reduce the cost of electronic data storage, facilitate electronic data collection and evidence identification, and improve litigation efficiency.

⑺ How to apply for online synchronization of lawsuits

On June 17, the Supreme People's Court held a press conference to introduce the development of how to apply for online synchronization of judicial proceedings in my country, and issued the "People's Court Online Litigation Rules" (hereinafter referred to as the "Rules") and "Selected Judicial Reform Cases of the People's Courts (11)". The "People's Court Online Litigation Rules" established a system of online litigation rules for the first time. It is currently the most integrated, most widely applicable, and highest-level normative document regarding online litigation, and is regarded as "the most authoritative rules for online litigation."
What is online litigation?
The "Rules" clearly define the meaning of online litigation for the first time, which can be either the entire process of online processing or the online processing of a certain litigation link, both of which are manifestations of online litigation.
How to handle online litigation? Take online case filing as an example:
1. Search the "China Mobile Micro Court" applet on WeChat
2. Click "Uncertified" next to your name for identity authentication
3. Click "Enter Mobile Micro Court" Platform" and enter the court in your province
4. Click "I want to file a case → File a case on WeChat → Select the applicant type → Check "Agree to strictly abide by the filing instructions" and click "Agree and continue"
5. Fill in Party information, fill in the basic information for filing the case, fill in the information of the plaintiff, defendant, and agent
6. Add litigation materials, add a collector, and after confirming the case filing information, submit the case
7. Wait for court review, usually within 7 days. You can check the relevant information of the case filed on WeChat in "My Cases".
Li Shaoping, Vice President of the Supreme People's Court, introduced that so far, more than 3,500 courts across the country have connected to the "China Mobile Micro Court" online litigation platform, with a cumulative number of visits of more than 1.265 billion, providing the public with diversified and comprehensive services. chain, one-stop online litigation services. From January 1, 2020 to May 31, 2021, courts nationwide filed 12.197 million cases online, accounting for 28.3% of all cases; the total number of online mediations was 6.513 million, and 6.1429 million cases were successfully mediated before litigation; There were 1.288 million online court sessions, with an average online hearing time of 42.34 minutes; there were 33.833 million electronic services, accounting for 37.97% of the total number of services. Through the unremitting efforts of courts across the country, the scale and quality of online litigation applications have been continuously improved, and a litigation model in which online and offline dual-track parallel and orderly connections have been initially formed.
Are online lawsuits voluntary or mandatory? Is the security of personal information guaranteed?
The "Rules" provide a strong response to public concerns about the selection of applicable online lawsuits and the protection of data and information security. Article 2 of the "Rules" clarifies the principles of legality, voluntariness and safety and reliability of online litigation.
The principle of "legality and voluntariness" emphasizes that the right of the parties and other litigation participants to choose the method of litigation is respected and protected. Without the consent or active choice of the parties and other litigation participants, the People's Court shall not force or covertly force the application of online litigation.
The principle of "safety and reliability" emphasizes maintaining national security in accordance with the law, protecting state secrets, business secrets, personal privacy and personal information, and effectively ensuring the security of online litigation data and information. Standardize technology application, strictly adhere to technology neutrality, and ensure technology reliability. The "Rules" also proposed for the first time to standardize the application of technology, strictly adhere to technology neutrality, and ensure the reliability of technology. At the same time, the rules systematically standardized the application rules of online litigation identity authentication, blockchain certificate storage, audio-visual transmission, audio and video recording and other technologies, and clearly stipulated the application rules for all parties. The subject’s data security protection obligations and accountability mechanism.
The promulgation of the "Rules" fully reflects the People's Court's strong protection of the rights and interests of litigation participants and is conducive to better promoting the standardized development of online litigation.
What situations can be considered as "refusal to appear in court" and "withdrawing from court midway"?
In response to court order issues that arise during online proceedings, Article 25 of the "Rules" stipulates the discipline of online trials, emphasizing that persons appearing in court should respect judicial etiquette and abide by court discipline when participating in online trials. Among them, unless it is caused by network failure, equipment damage, power outage or force majeure, etc., if the party fails to participate in the online trial without justifiable reasons, it will be deemed as "refusing to appear in court"; if the party withdraws from the trial without permission, it will not correct after prompts and warnings. , it will be regarded as "withdrawing from the court midway". In the judicial practice of online litigation, once "refusal to appear in court" or "withdrawal from court midway" occurs, it will be handled in accordance with the provisions of relevant laws and judicial interpretations. The above regulations clarify the order rules of online trials and ensure the seriousness of online trials.and standardization, which is conducive to better ensuring procedural justice and resolutely safeguarding judicial authority.
What should I do if the parties cannot participate in the litigation at the same time and space?
The "Rules" affirmed the "asynchronous trial mechanism" for the first time, and proposed solutions for the situation where the parties are unable to participate in litigation activities at the same time and space, to further enhance judicial convenience and benefit the people, and improve the quality and efficiency of trials. Article 20 of the "Rules" clarifies that with the consent of all parties, the people's court can designate the parties to log in to the litigation platform separately within a certain period of time to carry out mediation, evidence exchange, investigation and inquiry, court hearing and other litigation activities in an asynchronous manner. At the same time, the "Rules" make special provisions for asynchronous trials in court trials, strictly limiting the scope of application, application conditions, and application methods, and treating them as a special form of trial where the parties have real difficulties and are unable to participate in the trial online at the same time, rather than the normal state of online trials. , effectively prevent the randomization and generalization of the application of asynchronous court hearings, and ensure the effective performance of its institutional functions.
Must all online litigation cases be made public online?
The "Rules" clarify that the court hearing processes of the following types of cases shall not be made public simultaneously online. First of all, it is clarified that for cases involving national security, state secrets, and personal privacy, the court hearing process shall not be disclosed on how to apply for a lawsuit online. Secondly, it is clarified that for civil cases involving minors, business secrets, divorce, etc., the parties shall not apply for disclosure. If the case is being heard, the online trial process does not need to be made public on How to apply for online synchronization of a lawsuit; finally, it is clear that without the consent of the People's Court, no one is allowed to record, intercept, or disseminate audio, video, graphic materials involving the online trial process in violation of laws and regulations. The above provisions effectively achieve the balance between judicial disclosure and rights protection, and fully reflect the people's courts' effective protection of state secrets, commercial secrets, personal privacy and personal information.
Do scanned copies of evidence have the same validity as originals?
As to the issue of whether electronic materials can be used directly in litigation, the "Rules" have clarified. Article 12 of the "Rules" points out that electronic materials that have been reviewed and approved by the People's Court can be used directly in litigation. However, in order to ensure the authenticity of the electronic materials in four circumstances, the People's Court should require the parties to provide the original, original. The promulgation of the "Rules" means that electronic materials that have been reviewed and approved by the People's Court have the effect of being "seen as originals", and parties do not need to repeatedly submit physical original materials. This solves the problem of material submission in online litigation to a certain extent. It has greatly reduced the litigation burden on the parties and better utilized the function of online litigation to facilitate and benefit the people.
How to review the currently popular blockchain certificates?
With the gradual maturity of blockchain technology and the vigorous promotion of notary institutions, third-party certificate deposit platforms, etc., the use of blockchain certificate deposits has become more and more widespread, and blockchain-related disputes have also increased. However, blockchain certificate deposits The review has always been a difficult problem in judicial practice. In this regard, Article 16 of the "Rules" stipulates the scope of validity of blockchain certificates for the first time, clarifying the validity of the data stored in the blockchain that is presumed to have not been tampered with after being uploaded to the chain; Articles 17 and 18The article stipulates the authenticity review rules for blockchain stored data after and before it is uploaded to the chain. The promulgation of the "Rules" systematically and comprehensively solves the problem of authenticity determination of blockchain evidence, which is conducive to standardizing the judicial application of blockchain technology, stricting the review standards of blockchain evidence, giving full play to the advantages of blockchain technology, and further promoting The blockchain certification industry is developing in an orderly manner.
Will someone use online litigation to create false lawsuits?
Liu Zheng, deputy director of the Judicial Reform Office of the Supreme People's Court, said that while respecting the parties' right to make independent choices and fully protecting the parties' litigation rights, the Rules also highly emphasize the normativeness, stability and authority of litigation, which may prevent some parties from Abuse of rights affects the litigation process and damages the legitimate litigation rights and interests of other parties. For example, Article 5 of the "Rules" clarifies that if a party proposes to switch from online to offline trials, it must not deliberately delay the litigation or increase the costs of other parties, otherwise the People's Court will not grant permission. Article 6 of the "Rules" clarifies that parties who have agreed to online litigation but do not participate in online litigation activities without justifiable reasons shall bear corresponding legal consequences. At the same time, in order to ensure that online litigation activities are legal, authentic, and effective, the "Rules" specify and clarify the identity authentication rules, which not only require the identity of the litigation subject to be verified before litigation, but also require identity verification again in important links such as mediation, evidence exchange, and court hearings. , ensure the authenticity of the identity of the litigation subject, and effectively prevent false mediation and false litigation.
[Extended information]
How to apply for online synchronized justice in lawsuits in my country? What is the level of it in the world?
He Fan, deputy director of the International Cooperation Bureau of the Supreme People's Court, said that in the era of online synchronization of how to apply for litigation, almost all countries have realized the huge potential and space for the application of information technology in the judicial field. Since the beginning of this century, the United Kingdom, South Korea, Singapore, Austria and other countries have regarded online synchronization of lawsuit applications as an important means for the public to "reach justice", and have explored the introduction of online filing and electronic filing technologies. “Online courts” also appeared in court reform plans in some countries, but were ultimately shelved due to institutional obstacles and funding issues. Objectively speaking, my country's online synchronized judicial construction does not have a first-mover advantage, and it started relatively late. Since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, with the full implementation of the Internet Power Strategy, my country's judicial development has also ushered in unprecedented historical opportunities. From promoting the comprehensive Internet access of judgment documents, to the simultaneous generation of electronic files, comprehensive promotion of cross-domain case filing, and one-stop processing of mobile micro courts, to the establishment of how to apply for online synchronization of courts for litigation, and exploration of blockchain certificate storage and smart contract performance, the People's Court has adapted With the development of the times, we are determined to explore and innovate, and promote all-round transformation and upgrading in the fields of technology application, procedural rules, physical judgment and other fields. Now, we can confidently say that the development of China's judicial system has moved from "following" to "leading" and has achieved "overtaking around the corner."

⑻ How blockchain technology can transform electronic data intoLegal and effective electronic evidence

With the rapid development of the Internet and information technology, a large amount of evidence in litigation is gradually presented in the form of electronic data storage. With the help of blockchain technology, in judicial practice, how to overcome the problem of electronic evidence? Data has the natural flaws of being "difficult to obtain evidence, easy to lose, and easy to forge". How to ensure that it can be used as evidence in court?
Blockchain is based on technical features such as multi-party consensus, non-tampering, transparency and traceability, which can effectively solve the problems of electronic evidence such as "large quantity, scattered evidence, difficulty in obtaining evidence, easy to be tampered, and difficult to identify", and realize "electronic data "Transforming to "legal and effective electronic evidence" will facilitate the identification of electronic data evidence and improve litigation efficiency in the field of judicial evidence storage.
On September 3, 2018, the Supreme People's Court issued the "Regulations on Several Issues Concerning the Trial of Cases by Internet Courts", which for the first time determined that on-chain data can be used as a basis for judicial admission.
On May 18, 2021, the Supreme People's Court issued the "People's Court Online Litigation Rules" and came into effect on August 1. For the first time, it stipulated the scope of effectiveness of blockchain storage and clarified the scope of blockchain storage. After the data is uploaded to the chain, it is presumed to be valid without tampering. At the same time, the authenticity review rules for blockchain storage data after and before they are uploaded to the chain have been established.
This not only promotes the integration of blockchain technology and litigation rules, but also opens up the development path of the blockchain judicial model.
Yibaoquan is one of the first companies to register for blockchain information services through the Cyberspace Administration of China. It uses self-developed security chain technology to build a consortium chain, and combines blockchain with justice to build a data storage system. The notarization system can well solve the credibility problem of the entire chain of electronic data from generation and storage to notarization and proof:
When uploading to the chain, blockchain technology is used to store the data in advance with multiple parties. , to ensure the originality and integrity of the evidence-stored data; after being uploaded to the chain, the data is synchronized with each node on the alliance chain for backup and retention, ensuring the credibility and security of the data; during litigation, the evidence can be verified at multiple judicial nodes , extraction, and relevant judicial documents can also be issued online, effectively improving the efficiency of rights protection.

⑼ How is blockchain technology related to electronic evidence?

The unique characteristics of blockchain technology such as non-tampering, non-repudiation, and multi-party participation are closely related to electronic data storage. The needs fit naturally. Electronic data storage is an important potential application area of ​​blockchain technology.

Faced with the growing demand for electronic data storage, traditional evidence storage methods have gradually revealed shortcomings such as high cost, low efficiency, and difficulty in acceptance. In addition, in judicial practice, parties generally lack the ability to produce evidence, and the quality of electronic evidence submitted to the court is poor. There are a lot of problems such as improper evidence collection procedures, incomplete evidence, and poor pointing to the facts of the case, which directly affect the use of electronic evidence in litigation. Acceptance ratio.

The combination of blockchain and electronic data storage can reduce the cost of electronic data storage, facilitate the identification of electronic data evidence, and improve the efficiency of litigation in the field of judicial storage.

Therefore, we have been committed toIt integrates blockchain technology into products to provide users with financial-level security: for example, by uniting multiple parties (including forensic appraisal centers) to jointly establish a judicial evidence storage chain, achieving decentralized evidence permanent solidification and storage, while simplifying traditional evidence collection. certification process. That is, distributed blockchain evidence storage technology is used to ensure that contract evidence is not tampered with.