英国网络3社区在2022年5月做出了一项重要的法律决定，这是一个前所未有的先例。伦敦高等法院裁定不可替代的代币（NFT）代表私有财产。然而，根据法院的裁决，这种私有财产状态并没有扩展到NFT可能代表的实际底层。虽然这不是一场真正的革命，但它肯定会帮助这个行业打击欺诈行为。 从NFT盗窃到私有财产状态。 2022年2月，BossBeauties收藏中的两部数字作品被盗。这些NFT涉及许多有效点。举例来说，他们允许访问独家活动、免费书籍和其他福利。后来被盗代币出现在OpenSea市场。 这起案件于3月在法庭上结束。2022年4月29日，《艺术报》报道了英国高等法院的判决。事实上，法官已经承认NFT是一种受法律保护的财产。法院还发布了一项禁令，要求冻结ozonenetworks（opensea的主机）账户上的资产。法院还强制opensea披露持有两名被盗NFT账户持有人的信息。 由于钱包持有者的身份不确定，禁令针对的是不知名的人。律师事务所的Stephensonlaw表示，冻结令是一种相当严格的补救措施，被称为法律的核武器。根据后者的说法，它消除了NFT本身的任何不确定性，这与英它们所代表的不确定性。 如果你有一个令牌，你就有一个令牌。但是，其他任何东西都不一定有权利。 威德纳大学英联邦法学院教授，JulietMoringiello。 美国国税局已经通过了NFT的专有地位。然而，在英国和美国，代币与其标的资产之间的差异造成了法律真空。 史无前例的NFT先例。 无论是艺术品还是其他受版权保护的材料，NFT所代表的基本财产或资产在英国和美国的版权法中一直受到同样的管辖。这一决定无助于澄清这种差异。 Metaphysic.ai的首席执行官和联合创始人TomGraham，Web3公司。 对于汤姆·格雷厄姆来说，这一决定仍然创造了一个有趣的先例，因为法院禁止了opensea。这对于法院在NFT盗窃期间的干预和禁令非常重要。 很明显，NFT现在受同一英国财产法的管辖，所有其他财产都有管辖权。这为人们投资NFT创造了一个重要的先例。至少在英国，法律制度将保护他们的财产权。 Metaphysic.ai的首席执行官和联合创始人TomGraham，Web3公司。 建立一个法律先例可以给NFT平台带来更多的安慰，以确定大多数人已经相信的情况。事实上，他们现在可以合法地要求冻结恶意行为者的账户。 难怪NFT被认为是私有财产或个人财产。你可以购买、出售或交易NFT，这基本上表明它们是个人财产。如果法院裁定NFT不是个人财产，那就更令人震惊了。 数字金融公司Aquanow的首席合规官AnnaTrinh。 如果说拥有一个裸体的麦当娜NFT意味着她的主人公拥有这个女主角，那无疑会引起一些争议。然而，这位艺术家创造了三个NFT集合，以获得一个良好的职业生涯。 如果NFT是个人财产，那么加密货币也是。你只需要把它们存入你的钱包。如果您想购买第一个比特币，请立即在基准加密货币平台货币（附属链接）上注册。 NFT文章首先出现在JournalduCoin上，被英国法院认定为私有财产。

The UK Network 3 community made an important legal decision in May 2022, which sets an unprecedented precedent. London's High Court has ruled that non-fungible tokens (NFTs) represent private property. However, according to the court’s ruling, this private property status does not extend to the actual underlying that the NFT may represent. While this isn’t really a revolution, it will certainly help the industry fight fraud. From NFT theft to private property status. In February 2022, two digital works from the BossBeauties collection were stolen. There are many valid points involved in these NFTs. For example, they allow access to exclusive events, free books, and other perks. The stolen tokens later appeared on the OpenSea market. The case ended in court in March. On April 29, 2022, The Art Newspaper reported the judgment of the British High Court. In fact, judges have recognized NFTs as property protected by law. The court also issued an injunction requiring the freezing of assets on the ozonenetworks (opensea host) account. The court also forced Opensea to disclose information about two account holders who had stolen NFTs. Since the identity of the wallet holder is uncertain, the ban targets unknown persons. Stephensonlaw of the law firm said that the freezing order is a quite strict remedy and has been called the nuclear weapon of the law. According to the latter, it removes any uncertainty about the NFTs themselves, unlike what they represent. If you have a token, you have a token. However, anything else does not necessarily have rights. Juliet Moringiello, professor at Widener University Commonwealth School of Law. The IRS has approved exclusive status for NFTs. However, in the UK and US, the differences between tokens and their underlying assets have created a legal vacuum. Unprecedented NFT precedent. Whether an artwork or other copyrighted material, the underlying property or asset represented by an NFT has always been subject to the same jurisdiction under UK and US copyright law. This decision does nothing to clarify this difference. Tom Graham, CEO and co-founder of Metaphysic.ai, a Web3 company. For Tom Graham, the decision still sets an interesting precedent as the court banned OpenSea. This is important for court intervention and injunctions during NFT theft. It is clear that NFTs are now governed by the same UK property laws as all other properties. This creates an important precedent for people to invest in NFTs. At least in the UK, the legal system will protect their property rights. Tom Graham, CEO and co-founder of Metaphysic.ai, a Web3 company. Establishing a legal precedent could give NFT platforms more comfort in establishing what the majority of people already believe. In fact, they are nowIt is possible to legitimately request that a malicious actor's account be frozen. No wonder NFTs are considered private property or personal property. You can buy, sell or trade NFTs, which basically means they are personal property. It would be even more shocking if a court ruled that NFTs are not personal property. Anna Trinh, chief compliance officer at digital finance company Aquanow. It would undoubtedly cause some controversy if owning a naked Madonna NFT meant that its protagonist owned the heroine. However, the artist created a collection of three NFTs to make a good career out of it. If NFTs are personal property, so are cryptocurrencies. You just need to deposit them into your wallet. If you want to buy your first Bitcoin, sign up today on Benchmark Cryptocurrency Platform Currencies (affiliate link). The article NFT was deemed private property by a UK court appeared first on JournalduCoin.