暴风股价区块链怎么样,暴风影音区块链

近年来，区块链技术已经成为一种新兴的技术，广泛应用于各个行业，其中暴风影音也是一个突出的例子。暴风股价区块链怎么样，让我们一起来看看。

首先，暴风影音的区块链技术可以更好地保护用户的隐私信息，它可以有效防止数据泄露，让用户可以放心地使用暴风影音的服务。此外，区块链技术还可以提高暴风影音的运行效率，从而更好地满足用户的需求。

此外，暴风影音的区块链技术还可以更好地促进其股价上涨。由于区块链技术可以提高企业的运行效率，使企业的财务状况得到改善，从而提高其股价。此外，暴风影音的区块链技术还可以帮助企业更好地开发新的产品和服务，从而提升其市场份额，进而推动其股价上涨。

总之，暴风影音的区块链技术可以为用户提供更安全、更高效的服务，并且可以有效推动暴风股价的上涨，为投资者带来更多的收益。因此，可以肯定的是，暴风股价区块链是非常有利的。

综上所述，暴风影音的区块链技术可以为用户提供更安全、更高效的服务，并且可以有效推动暴风股价的上涨，为投资者带来更多的收益，因此，暴风股价区块链是非常有利的。

① Exclusive | Feng Xin was suspected of criminal crimes related to the bankruptcy of the MPS project, and Everbright denied reporting the case

Editor/Song Wei

The person said that the economic litigation between Everbright and Baofeng is ongoing, and Feng Xin was taken away directly by the public security organs, which is suspected of criminal offenses. The failure of MPS was mainly because Baofeng failed to fulfill the repurchase agreement, which led to a series of subsequent breaches of contract.

According to multiple media reports, there were thunderstorms in many Baofeng projects, which may reflect that this once star company is facing one after another financial risks, and its company's operating performance also continued to decline in the first half of the year, with thousands of losses. Loss of 10,000 level.

In February 2016, Everbright Jinhui (a subsidiary of Everbright Securities) joined forces with Baofeng Group and others to establish the Jinxin Fund, leveraging 5.2 billion yuan of capital with 260 million yuan, and completed the global sports event investment in May. Acquisition of 65% of the equity of copyright company MP &Silva Holding S.A. (MPS). The acquisition was promoted as a star project. But two years later, the three founders of MPS cashed out and left, and the company also ran into difficulties and went bankrupt.

Subsequent facts showed that the acquisition caused huge losses to the participants, and funds with multiple state-owned backgrounds were also partially involved. According to information from Tianyancha, in addition to Baofeng Investment, Everbright Capital, and Everbright Jinhui, Jinxin Fund also involves 11 LPs. The investors behind it are China Merchants Bank, Huarui Bank, Oriental Assets, Jupai Investment, and Yunnan and Guizhou Provinces. State-owned assets are all in trouble.

Tianyancha shows that China Merchants Fortune (LP) invested 2.8 billion yuan; Aijian Trust (LP) invested 400 million yuan; Yingtan Langtaosha Investment Management Partnership (Limited Partnership) (LP), Invested 315 million yuan; Baofeng Group (LP), invested 200 million yuan; Everbright Capital (LP), invested 60 million yuan; China Everbright Capital (GP), invested 1 million yuan; Baofeng Investment (GP), invested 1 million yuan, etc. .

In all this, according to the previous agreement, Everbright Capital needs to be the ultimate backer and bear the capital losses of billions of yuan. As a result, a series of lawsuits broke out. As the largest investor of Jinxin Fund, China Merchants Fortune invested 2.8 billion yuan. In June 2019, China Merchants Bank sued Everbright Capital, requiring the latter to fulfill its obligation to make up the relevant balance and claiming 3.489 billion yuan. On May 8, Everbright sued Baofeng, claiming 750 million yuan.

A person familiar with the matter said that it is often difficult to fully supervise overseas projects of Chinese institutions. Everbright Securities may also have insufficient supervision of overseas projects, and Feng Xin actually lacks experience in overseas investments. , and the specific operations are quite aggressive and reckless, so it is not ruled out that there may be violations or even violations in the process such as the source of money or the use of funds.Where illegal activities are suspected. More truth remains to be revealed through further investigation by the judiciary, but the initial lessons and flaws can already be seen.

The above-mentioned lawyer said that pursuing criminal liability is sometimes a means of exerting pressure. Feng Xin promised to provide Everbright with a guarantee but failed to fulfill it after the project suffered losses. The transaction amount was large and it collapsed in a short period of time. The relevant institutions may have Feng Xin was taken away on common charges such as bribery and misappropriation of funds.

"If there were not 32 daily limits, it might not be like this"

At the same time, Feng Xin's WeChat name was changed from Feng Xin to Feng Xin. A person close to Feng Xin said that Feng Xin would leave Beijing every once in a while to "retreat in seclusion". Someone once criticized the word "Xin" as unlucky and similar to "bad luck". I wonder if this was the reason for the name change.

A senior media person commented, "If Baofeng returns to A-shares, if there is no 32 daily limit, it may not be like this." Feng Xin said that he was kidnapped by Baofeng, which may be his true expression .

Since its listing on March 24, 2015, Baofeng Group has created 32 A-share myths with daily limit. The market value once exceeded 40 billion. Feng Xin’s personal net worth also exceeded 10 billion yuan. Within the group, overnight During this period, 10 billionaires, 31 multi-millionaires and 66 millionaires were born.

In the myth of Baofeng Group’s sudden wealth, it has been accompanied by stories such as VR, sports, film industry and even blockchain. In Feng Xin’s strategic plan, he wants to build Baofeng into a The leader of new entertainment platforms, but most of these stories have not been followed.

A person familiar with Feng Xin commented, "(Feng Xin) wanted to grow bigger, but he bet on the wrong trend. This is the biggest tragedy for entrepreneurs." Baofeng and Jia Yueting's capital expansion models are similar, and they went public. The main business is losing money, and the incubated Baofeng TV and Baofeng Sports all need money. ”

After the stock market crash in 2015, Baofeng missed a good opportunity to conduct additional stock issuance and financing. Lack of money is the biggest problem faced by Baofeng.

Starting from the end of 2015, Baofeng participated in Among several industrial funds, including the 500 million yuan industrial fund "Baofeng Xinyuan" established in cooperation with Gopher Asset; the Shanghai Junsheng M&A Fund established in cooperation with CITIC Capital, Xidongpai Ping An Trust and other institutions, the total fund size 684 million yuan, Feng Xin has made a minimum return guarantee for the fund as a whole (annualized return of 11%).

Among these funds, Feng Xin bears joint repurchase responsibility for their investment returns. Equity pledge It is Feng Xin’s most important source of funds, and currently all Baofeng Group stocks under Feng Xin’s own name have been pledged or frozen. On July 25, two execution rulings issued by the Beijing Court Trial Information Network showed that Baofeng Group’s There was no property available for execution, and the court included him in the list of people subject to execution for breach of trust.

"Caijing" also asked Gopher for confirmation, and Gopher denied reporting the case. According to Gopher, heOur project related to Feng Xin is isolated from the previous Chengxing project and is a different project.

As of July 26, Baofeng’s net assets per share were only 0.02 yuan. Baofeng’s stock price fell to 6.30 yuan, with a market value of only 2.076 billion yuan.

Feng Xin also said in an internal speech in 2018, "Since Baofeng was listed, I have not cashed in any shares, and only a very small part of the money pledged by the shares has been used to supplement family income. The rest are used for business development, and they bear a lot of guarantee pressure for the company's business."

"A poor person who was crushed by opportunities." A person familiar with Feng Xin said.