为广大币圈朋友提供币圈基础入门专业知识!
当前位置首页 > 区块链知识> 正文

区块链存证系统,区块链 存证 技术原理

发布时间:2023-12-16-10:14:00 来源:网络 区块链知识 区块   判决   首例

区块链存证系统,区块链 存证 技术原理


请查看相关英文文档

『一』Zhejiang Shaoxing sentenced the country’s first criminal case with blockchain evidence

Between January 2017 and March 13, 2019, the defendant Wang Moumou In Jiangsu Province, Zhejiang Province, Jiangxi Province and other places, they made up excuses such as "cannot find fellow villagers, lost their wallets" and used "borrowing" to defraud others of their property in 176 cases, totaling RMB 9,993.

There are many victims in this case, scattered across the country, and the single crime amount is small and large. If the relevant evidence is recorded in the form of traditional CD-ROMs and transferred between the police, prosecutors, and law, it will be possible Data loss occurs due to disc damage, or data in the disc is tampered with.

How to effectively encrypt and store electronic evidence has become the key to solving such problems. During the case handling process, the Shangyu District Judicial Authority teamed up with the Ant Blockchain team to encrypt the data with blockchain technology and ensure the authenticity of the evidence through later hash value comparison.

It is worth mentioning that the circulation and comparison of evidence in this case ran through the entire process of investigation, prosecution, and trial, and was unanimously recognized by the public security and prosecutorial agencies.

The relevant person in charge of the Criminal Division of Shangyu Court said, “Blockchain is a tamper-proof, traceable, and shared distributed ledger technology. The use of blockchain for encrypted certificate storage has been available as early as 2018. It has been confirmed by the Supreme People’s Court, and has been used in judgments in civil and commercial cases, but its application in criminal cases is the first in the country.”

The successful judgment of this case is a key to the use of blockchain. Technology for electronic data storage and review is of great significance. In the next stage, Shangyu Court will also actively explore "IOT+blockchain" technology with Ant Blockchain to build trusted data collection equipment and upload the data calculated by the equipment to the chain in real time to ensure the authenticity, safety and reliability of the storage and transmission links. Promote the authenticity of electronic data to extend to the source.

『二』Blockchain electronic evidence effectiveness, micro-copyright how to use blockchain to empower intellectual property protection

The State Intellectual Property Office recognized the effectiveness of blockchain electronic evidence, micro-copyright can Provide blockchain rights verification, infringement monitoring, network evidence collection and other services to fully empower intellectual property protection.
Ebaoquan's blockchain intellectual property protection platform - micro-copyright, micro-copyright can generate a unique digital fingerprint for the photography user's subject information, certificate storage time, certificate storage process and certificate storage content, and store it encrypted to the blockchain, and generate a global supervision summary, which is synchronized to the official websites of notary offices, arbitration committees and other institutions to accept public supervision inquiries. The digital fingerprint and global supervision summary will be recorded on the blockchain rights confirmation certificate.
At the same time, Micro Copyright can provide online copyright registration services. Users can apply online for copyright certificates issued by the Copyright Office through the official website of Micro Copyright, including paper copyright certificates and digital copyright certificates, which can be issued in as soon as 1 day. Help users save application costs and improve copyright registration efficiencyRate, quickly obtain the evidence of the ownership of the work as soon as possible.
In terms of infringement monitoring, micro-copyright uses fingerprint feature extraction and comparison technology, combined with web crawlers, cloud computing, big data analysis and other technologies to conduct 7*24-hour infringement monitoring on the entire network for pictures, text, videos and other works. Extract, clean, store and manage massive data, and automatically identify and determine which content involves plagiarism according to a certain algorithm. The crawling range is wider, the cost is lower, and the efficiency is higher.
For the monitored content, Micro Copyright will analyze and sort the infringing objects, infringing works and infringement results, output the contact information, domain names and other data of the infringing objects, and automatically analyze and organize the infringing subjects to quickly locate the infringing subjects. Enterprises and law firms can assign relevant lawyers to follow up on rights protection based on the analysis content to improve the efficiency of rights protection.

『三』 Has the SMS representative of the Tianping chain side chain been sued

Hello, let me answer this question. Don't click, otherwise it will count as your authorization

There should be something wrong.

According to news from the Beijing Internet Court on April 11, on April 9, the Beijing Internet Court’s first judgment using “Tian Ping Chain” evidence was released.

"Tianping Chain" is an open electronic evidence platform established under the leadership of the Beijing Internet Court to solve the problems of electronic evidence storage, evidence collection and identification. It was launched on September 9, 2018 and is in operation as of 4 On March 11, the Beijing Internet Court’s “Tianping Chain” collected 3,598,143 pieces of online data and 657 pieces of online evidence verification data. There have been 58 cases involving Tianping Chain evidence, of which more than 40 cases have been successfully mediated or withdrawn.

In this case, a copyrighted picture of the plaintiff Blue Denim Company was used by the defendant Huachuang Huicai Company in an article on its public account. The plaintiff requires the defendant to pay compensation of 7,000 yuan and reasonable expenses of 3,000 yuan to stop the defendant's infringement.

According to the Beijing Internet Court, Blue Jeans had previously applied to a third-party evidence storage platform for electronic data storage of infringed evidence, and also stored evidence of infringement clues on the chain. After cross-chain operations, relevant evidence has been stored in the "Tianping Chain". When the lawsuit occurred, the plaintiff Blue Denim Company filed the case online through the Beijing Internet Court Electronic Litigation Platform, and simultaneously submitted the complaint, user identity verification information, original documents confirming rights and certificates, original documents of infringement clues, and documents containing blockchain certificate numbers. . The electronic litigation platform of the Beijing Internet Court retrieved the "Tianping Chain" for automatic verification. The verification results showed that the evidence involved in the case had not been tampered with since it was deposited on the "Tianping Chain", and the result of the blockchain certificate was "verification successful" .

Be careful when opening unknown links and be careful of scams. If you are prosecuted, court staff will definitely contact you (of course, you must verify your identity, because some people dare to impersonate public prosecutors and law enforcement personnel).

Do not listen to other links, do not believe them, do not transfer funds, and do not remit money.

Online loans are fraud, and fake orders are fraud

『四』 Beijing Internet Court and Blockchain Certificate Deposit System"IP360" achieves seamless docking

Recently, the IP360 platform evidence has been docked with the Beijing Internet Court litigation platform. Submitted evidence can be submitted to the Beijing Internet Court platform after providing evidence through the IP360 platform.

Since the afternoon of September 25, the Dongcheng District Court of Beijing has made a judgment on the case of JD.com infringing on the network dissemination rights of works of the Chinese Online Digital Publishing Group. In this judgment, the court considered the IP360 forensic data evidence provided by Zhenchen Technology. Adopted, confirms the legal validity of electronic data stored using blockchain technology, and clarifies the review and judgment method for blockchain electronic certificates.

This time, the Beijing Dongcheng District Court based on The judgment of intellectual property cases based on blockchain evidence has attracted widespread public attention and laid a good foundation for the completion of the docking with the Beijing Internet Court.

But nationwide, this This is not the only case in which "blockchain + certificate storage" was recognized by the court.

Subsequently, on September 7, the Supreme People's Court issued regulations on several issues in the trial of Internet courts. . The regulations clearly state that “the electronic data submitted by the parties shall be authenticated through electronic signatures, trusted timestamps, hash value verification, blockchain and other evidence collection, fixation and anti-tampering technical means, or through electronic evidence collection and storage platforms.” , if its authenticity can be proven, the Internet Court should confirm it. ”

With the establishment of Internet courts in Hangzhou, Beijing, Guangzhou and other places, the blockchain evidence storage system is undoubtedly the biggest highlight in the construction process of Internet courts. In a world where traditional electronic data itself is easily tampered with In this case, blockchain, as a "distributed storage technology", has the characteristics of irreversibility and non-tampering. Through blockchain smart contracts, business rules are abstracted into digital contracts, embedded in blockchain for execution, and can be verified, ensuring Every step is carried out strictly in accordance with the pre-set process, thereby ensuring the authenticity of electronic data. In the case where Chinese Online won the lawsuit against JD.com for the network dissemination rights of work information, it was conducted online through the blockchain certificate storage system "IP360" Evidence collection. It is understood that this system is an evidence storage and verification platform independently developed based on legalXchain, a judicial alliance chain under Truth Technology. Working with the Ministry of Public Security, judicial appraisal, notary offices and other institutions, the review and identification of electronic evidence can be completed online. Greatly improve litigation efficiency.

Compared with traditional litigation methods, "blockchain evidence storage" is undoubtedly a huge progress. With the continuous upgrading of blockchain technology, future litigation settlement will only be More fair and efficient.

『Wu』 It’s too expensive to get copyright certification for a casual video. It costs more than 300 yuan to go to the Copyright Office to get one. Is there a cheaper way?

It’s the same as doing blockchain certification. Go to Baopin.com and do video blockchain certification.It also has copyright benefits and can be used as evidence of infringement

『Lu』What to do if original pictures are infringed

Ordinary authors find that their works have been infringed and normally take the path of legal rights protection. However, due to digital Photo evidence collection is technically difficult, the process is complicated, and it is a drop in the bucket. In the end, it all comes to nothing.

Is there nothing you can do if the pictures you worked so hard to create are allowed to be pirated and abused? The magic changes every step, and the road goes up. The birth of the Internet Court makes full use of advanced information technology to serve the broad masses of the people!

On June 28, 2018, the country’s first blockchain certification case verdict was issued, which attracted widespread attention from people from all walks of life, including the legal and technical circles. In the first-instance judgment, the Hangzhou Internet Court supported the plaintiff’s use of a third-party evidence-deposit platform, Baoquan.com’s blockchain certificate-deposit technology, as a certificate-deposit method and identified the corresponding infringement facts.

Blockchain technology for evidence storage sounds confusing, but for users, using Baoquan.com to provide evidence and safeguard rights can easily solve historical problems in three steps.

Data storage: Upload your original pictures, texts, videos and other original works to fix the blockchain data

Certificate litigation: Infringement is discovered , Misappropriation of original evidence, online judicial agencies issued certificates as evidence in court

Under such circumstances, common Internet public relations methods such as "deleting comments", "deleting photos" and "deleting posts" have no place. Escape, the blockchain + evidence collection model not only simplifies the evidence collection process but also greatly reduces the cost of evidence collection.

博客主人唯心底涂
男,单身,无聊上班族,闲着没事喜欢研究股票,无时无刻分享股票入门基础知识,资深技术宅。
  • 38802 文章总数
  • 3637394访问次数
  • 3088建站天数